<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Code With Design</title>
	<atom:link href="http://codewithdesign.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://codewithdesign.com</link>
	<description>web application development blog by Caleb Jonasson</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 19:52:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Writing and reading objects and arrays to a binary file with java by Rzaingee</title>
		<link>http://codewithdesign.com/2010/04/07/writing-and-reading-objects-and-arrays-to-a-binary-file-with-java/comment-page-1/#comment-4508</link>
		<dc:creator>Rzaingee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 19:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://codewithdesign.com/?p=393#comment-4508</guid>
		<description>its nice</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>its nice</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Create a press enter to continue with java by Guest</title>
		<link>http://codewithdesign.com/2010/01/17/create-a-press-enter-to-continue-with-java/comment-page-1/#comment-4507</link>
		<dc:creator>Guest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 08:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://codewithdesign.com/?p=251#comment-4507</guid>
		<description>thx,, that is a very simple helpful code,, *thumbUp*</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thx,, that is a very simple helpful code,, *thumbUp*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Zend Studio Shift Tab Fix by Econxny</title>
		<link>http://codewithdesign.com/2011/06/10/zend-studio-shift-tab-fix/comment-page-1/#comment-4506</link>
		<dc:creator>Econxny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 16:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://codewithdesign.com/?p=555#comment-4506</guid>
		<description>Good Post </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good Post</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Comma Operator in Java by Kishan</title>
		<link>http://codewithdesign.com/2011/02/02/the-comma-operator-in-java/comment-page-1/#comment-4501</link>
		<dc:creator>Kishan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2011 08:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://codewithdesign.com/?p=469#comment-4501</guid>
		<description>Can we do this
psv main(String []args)
{
  int z=0,x=0;
   z++, x += 2; // This is the statement to be noted  ,  not the others
}
??

If not, we can do this inside for loop why not as a general statement ??
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can we do this<br />
psv main(String []args)<br />
{<br />
  int z=0,x=0;<br />
   z++, x += 2; // This is the statement to be noted  ,  not the others<br />
}<br />
??</p>
<p>If not, we can do this inside for loop why not as a general statement ??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Google&#8217;s Plus 1 Button Integration And Options by Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://codewithdesign.com/2011/06/29/googles-plus-1-button-integration-and-options/comment-page-1/#comment-4497</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Oct 2011 19:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://codewithdesign.com/?p=562#comment-4497</guid>
		<description>This isn&#039;t just a new trend to talk about because it does add value to a website. Page ranks go up and it is a sharing feature rather than a simple button showing how many people like and it does drive traffic to websites via an application like G+.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This isn&#8217;t just a new trend to talk about because it does add value to a website. Page ranks go up and it is a sharing feature rather than a simple button showing how many people like and it does drive traffic to websites via an application like G+.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Google&#8217;s Plus 1 Button Integration And Options by Links About Working With Google+ &#124; Sunshine Coast + Website Design + Logos + Stationary + Queensland</title>
		<link>http://codewithdesign.com/2011/06/29/googles-plus-1-button-integration-and-options/comment-page-1/#comment-4496</link>
		<dc:creator>Links About Working With Google+ &#124; Sunshine Coast + Website Design + Logos + Stationary + Queensland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2011 06:02:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://codewithdesign.com/?p=562#comment-4496</guid>
		<description>[...] forget sticking a Google +1 button on your blog, this handy tutorial shows you [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] forget sticking a Google +1 button on your blog, this handy tutorial shows you [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Google&#8217;s Plus 1 Button Integration And Options by Romero</title>
		<link>http://codewithdesign.com/2011/06/29/googles-plus-1-button-integration-and-options/comment-page-1/#comment-4495</link>
		<dc:creator>Romero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2011 20:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://codewithdesign.com/?p=562#comment-4495</guid>
		<description>Perhaps it sounds silly for you guys but I am feeling a bit, yes, almost afraid of what we are going to create by following google&#039;s plus1 policy. I want to explain:
Plus 1 only works when you log into a Google account. This alone will shrink the reach of this button markedly, like the facebook button. Means: if you publish content on intimate matters, let&#039;s say certain illnesses f.e., you will not gain follwers by this means. Now this may be an exception, you will say. But certainly a very big part of the web IS about intimate matters (just imagine the highest profit biz on the internet, ... porn). Facebook at least allows you to like something and hide it. Google doesn&#039;t, as far as I know. Facebook did this certainly for good reasons....
Then, the SERPs will be affected by the plus counts ... right now they claim, it&#039;s just affecting SERP listing as long as you stay logged in, prefering those results who received plusses by someone in your circle.
So, let&#039;s do a resume: All this requires that everybody and his dog have a Google account and, to make the story even more &quot;exciting&quot; (irony), you are supposed to stay logged into your Google account thus allowing Google to track almost your entire life!!! I mean, who will remember to log out when going into online banking, into perhaps other webmail accounts, surfing websites belonging into an intimate area of the person etc....
You are promoting a 1984 scenario without even noticing it.
This way Google will gather a database of the population of the western world to an extend that frightens me. Just imagine: they might deny listing in their SERPs to those websites that do not show their dammed button. If you want to advertize via Google you might gain a discount for every &quot;plus&quot; you acrued, thus forcing businesses to enter in this game. This is already on its way given the fact that SEO companies already claim the era of backlink spamming over, the next buzz in SEO is already Google Plus +1. All this doesn&#039;t really add any value to the web which is an information media. It just keeps webmasters busy to stay topic on the newest social buzz buzz all the time instead of letting them focus on creating good and relevant content! Sorry for the lengthy statement. I just needed to get rid of that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps it sounds silly for you guys but I am feeling a bit, yes, almost afraid of what we are going to create by following google&#8217;s plus1 policy. I want to explain:<br />
Plus 1 only works when you log into a Google account. This alone will shrink the reach of this button markedly, like the facebook button. Means: if you publish content on intimate matters, let&#8217;s say certain illnesses f.e., you will not gain follwers by this means. Now this may be an exception, you will say. But certainly a very big part of the web IS about intimate matters (just imagine the highest profit biz on the internet, &#8230; porn). Facebook at least allows you to like something and hide it. Google doesn&#8217;t, as far as I know. Facebook did this certainly for good reasons&#8230;.<br />
Then, the SERPs will be affected by the plus counts &#8230; right now they claim, it&#8217;s just affecting SERP listing as long as you stay logged in, prefering those results who received plusses by someone in your circle.<br />
So, let&#8217;s do a resume: All this requires that everybody and his dog have a Google account and, to make the story even more &#8220;exciting&#8221; (irony), you are supposed to stay logged into your Google account thus allowing Google to track almost your entire life!!! I mean, who will remember to log out when going into online banking, into perhaps other webmail accounts, surfing websites belonging into an intimate area of the person etc&#8230;.<br />
You are promoting a 1984 scenario without even noticing it.<br />
This way Google will gather a database of the population of the western world to an extend that frightens me. Just imagine: they might deny listing in their SERPs to those websites that do not show their dammed button. If you want to advertize via Google you might gain a discount for every &#8220;plus&#8221; you acrued, thus forcing businesses to enter in this game. This is already on its way given the fact that SEO companies already claim the era of backlink spamming over, the next buzz in SEO is already Google Plus +1. All this doesn&#8217;t really add any value to the web which is an information media. It just keeps webmasters busy to stay topic on the newest social buzz buzz all the time instead of letting them focus on creating good and relevant content! Sorry for the lengthy statement. I just needed to get rid of that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Google&#8217;s Plus 1 Button Integration And Options by Tuuu</title>
		<link>http://codewithdesign.com/2011/06/29/googles-plus-1-button-integration-and-options/comment-page-1/#comment-4494</link>
		<dc:creator>Tuuu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2011 06:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://codewithdesign.com/?p=562#comment-4494</guid>
		<description>Good</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Google&#8217;s Plus 1 Button Integration And Options by Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://codewithdesign.com/2011/06/29/googles-plus-1-button-integration-and-options/comment-page-1/#comment-4493</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Sep 2011 23:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://codewithdesign.com/?p=562#comment-4493</guid>
		<description>You raise a valid point but at the same time but the Google would have to add in the feature because if anyone wanted to display exactly what you were going to plus one they could still change the results of what the plus one actually leads to.

Either way I do think that Google has done a good job by keeping it simple for everyone to use and hopefully you trust the site that you are clicking plus one on.

If the site that was being plus one&#039;d did have external link some kind of warning or notification would be handy but at the same time It would intrude on the simplicity and speed of the button.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You raise a valid point but at the same time but the Google would have to add in the feature because if anyone wanted to display exactly what you were going to plus one they could still change the results of what the plus one actually leads to.</p>
<p>Either way I do think that Google has done a good job by keeping it simple for everyone to use and hopefully you trust the site that you are clicking plus one on.</p>
<p>If the site that was being plus one&#8217;d did have external link some kind of warning or notification would be handy but at the same time It would intrude on the simplicity and speed of the button.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Google&#8217;s Plus 1 Button Integration And Options by Matteo Conta</title>
		<link>http://codewithdesign.com/2011/06/29/googles-plus-1-button-integration-and-options/comment-page-1/#comment-4492</link>
		<dc:creator>Matteo Conta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Sep 2011 06:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://codewithdesign.com/?p=562#comment-4492</guid>
		<description>My only concern is that you can&#039;t see the details of what you are clicking, google shows only the number of +1 but, if you are referencing an external web site, you see the right url only analyzing the source code.

A better approach should be to show the linked site when the +1 button references something external to my web site.

Your example is correct but if you have a lot of stories in your blog then it should be possible to add a relative url, showing that the reference of your +1 button is local.

The problem are external references, imagine a feauture were your +1clicks are published to your publick profile... You click &#039;I like music&#039; and you publish on your profile that you support Nazi web site.... I think that it&#039;s not correct, right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My only concern is that you can&#8217;t see the details of what you are clicking, google shows only the number of +1 but, if you are referencing an external web site, you see the right url only analyzing the source code.</p>
<p>A better approach should be to show the linked site when the +1 button references something external to my web site.</p>
<p>Your example is correct but if you have a lot of stories in your blog then it should be possible to add a relative url, showing that the reference of your +1 button is local.</p>
<p>The problem are external references, imagine a feauture were your +1clicks are published to your publick profile&#8230; You click &#8216;I like music&#8217; and you publish on your profile that you support Nazi web site&#8230;. I think that it&#8217;s not correct, right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

